It seems that in many cases where pa'o is used, mo'i pa'o would be more accurate. Is this a misinterpretation on my part, or should this use be explicitly invalidated?
Coincident with. Indicates where the event is located. When tagging a sumti, the sumti indicates that which the event is coincident with, or in the same place as. The space equivalent of {ca}.
fi'o se zvati
Indicates that the event is near a certain point. When tagging a sumti, the sumti indicates the point the event is near or close to or in the vicinity of.
fi'o se zvajbi
Indicates that the event is inside something. When tagging a sumti, the sumti indicates what the event is inside of.
fi'o se nenri
Intersecting. Indicates that the event passes through a certain point or area. When tagging a sumti, the sumti indicates what the event passes through.
fi'o se pagre
Adjacent to. Indicates that the event is adjacent, touching or in contact with something. When tagging a sumti, the sumti indicates what the event is adjacent to, touching or contacting.
fi'o se lamji
Bordering. Indicates that the event is located at an edge, boundary or border. When tagging a sumti, the sumti indicates what the event is at an edge, boundary or border of.
fi'o se koizva
"into" is removed as a keyword from "ne'i" because "into" signifies motion.