Without qualification, refers to the article Loglan written by
James Cooke Brown, and published in Scientific American in June 1960.
People who wish to read it, can borrow it from a reasonably large
library, or they can ask TLI to send them a copy. That's how I
got it. That was in 1997, but if they have any copies left,
they probably still mail them out for free to anyone who asks for them.
The reason that the CV templates of the Loglan words turned out the way
we all know and love, is not given. It only says: "The reader is
challenged to find a combination of possible word-forms that does not
resolve."
The "little words" (cmavo) are unified as a class only semantically,
not morphologically (phonotactically). The word classes preceding
predicates (simple predicates (our gismu) and complex predicates (our
lujvo)) were as follows:
The Loglan text that occurs in the tables in the article is written in
all capitals, but the examples that occur inside the running text, is
written in the SAE orthography that is
common both to natural languages that use latinate scripts, and Loglan
of today. Still, there is some talk about audiovisual isomorphism, and
Loglan's "spoken punctuation" operators.
Most indicators (our attitudinals) were irrealis. In fact, there is a
theoretical possibility that ALL of them were irrealis. If we entertain
the possibility that even "ui" (our "ui") turns a predicate into a
non-claim, that does not entail that it turns it into a claim of the
opposite.
The only example of borrowing of vowel-final names, Mississippi, which
becomes "lu misisipis", displays the addition of an s in the end, which
is now the de facto standard of creating such names in Lojban (though
not governed by any rules).