Forum: WikiDiscuss

Wiki page BPFK Section: Subordinators changed

posts: 1912


> > > > ci prenu noi melbi cu klama
> What about:
> ci prenu noi melbi cu klama
> = ci prenu goi ko'a cu klama ije ro ko'acu melbi
> ?

Yes, that seems to work. You probably don't even need
the {ro}, so as to include non-distributive noi-clauses.

The quantifier {no} would be a special case: {no broda noi
brode cu brodi} seems to be either nonsensical or the noi-clause
is irrelevant, because there is nothing to apply it to.
Within any negation scope, in fact, modifying a quantified
term with a noi-clause gives nonsense.

mu'o mi'e xorxes


Do you Yahoo!?
Read only the mail you want - Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard.


The original document is available at