Wiki page BPFK Section: Subordinators changed
{pe} as given
{po} indicates possession in the sense of current or regular use, but not necessarily legal ownership
{po'e} indicates legal ownership (under the contextually relevant laws).
Ther is also the notion of "inalienable possession" such as obtains for one's body and body parts and a few other things (culturally defined). Those that Lojban (i.e. European culture) recognizes as such are marked in the place structure of the corresponding brivla; similar connection required by other cultures will be indicated by appropriate nonce forms.
(And then the gismu people have to make sure the claim about place structure is true — and perhps find a good source for a nonce form.)
Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote:
On Sun, Aug 22, 2004 at 12:57:05PM -0700, John E Clifford wrote:
> Just a last plea to separate legal ownership from use rights (and
> getting rid of inaleineable rights as a separate notion beyond what is
> in the place structure of the word for the object involved).
Give me a clear proposal and I'll see what I can do.
-Robin