Wiki page BPFK Section: Subordinators changed
A> No, now it includes legal ownership
B> Well, the present use for this is redundant — or very rare — and here is a distinction that is often important and moderately common.
Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote:
On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 06:27:48AM -0700, John E Clifford wrote:
> {pe} as given
>
> {po} indicates possession in the sense of current or regular use, but not necessarily legal ownership
A>Isn't that what it says now?
Or do you want it to mean *physical* possesssion?
> {po'e} indicates legal ownership (under the contextually relevant laws).
B>Umm, no, sorry. That's a major change, and I won't support it.
-Robin