Wiki page BPFK Section: Subordinators changed
Jorge Llambas wrote:
>{zo'e} can stand for the empty set, of course, that's a value.
>We rarely make claims about the empty set in everyday discourse,
>but if the empty set is the obvious value, there's no problem in
>{zo'e} referring to it.
>
>
I think that is all I ever wanted: that zo'e can refer to the empty set
when appropriate.
We could make an analogy with monetary values. If something is free, we
could say that it has no (monetary!) value, or that it has a value, and
that value's magnitude happens to be 0. They are both true.
--
Iraqi Olympic Soccer Coach Adnan Hamad: "You cannot speak about a team that represents freedom. We do not have freedom in Iraq, we have an occupying force. This is one of our most miserable times. To be honest with you, even our happiness at winning is not happiness because we are worried about the problems in Iraq, all the daily problems that our people face back home, so to tell you the truth, we are not really happy."