WikiDiscuss

On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 04:02:24PM -0400, xod wrote:
> You're insisting that
>
> dE botpi fo nodA
>
> is equivalent to
>
> dA na botpi fo nodA.

Then I made a mistake.

I insist that

da botpi fo no de

is equivalent to

da na botpi fo de

But as I recall, the original sentence used *ta*, not *da*. Your
second sentence is a double negative, by the way.

-Robin