BPFK Section: gadri
wikidiscuss@lojban.org wrote:
>Re: BPFK Section: gadri
>BTW, xod says that "lo broda poi brode" == "le broda" (with loss of information, of course).
>
>Is that always true, or is it specific to your scheme? Regardless, it seems to be true and I'd appreciate it if you mentioned it somewhere.
>
>
>-Robin
>
>
>
I've found a dyad of ideas which approximate *Intension* and
- Extension*, even if the correlation is not perfect. Intension is
similar to *selkaicfa*; la'e-like, beginning with a set of qualities,
one discusses the items, if any, that qualify. Extension is similar to
- kaicfa*; lu'e-like, beginning with an object in mind, one discusses its
qualities in order to describe it. (When I use "any" in English, I am
experiencing selkaicfa; I have a requirement in mind, and I am referring
to whatever items fit the bill. However, I also can use "any" to express
a lack of preference among the members of a set, all of whose members
might be known specifically to me: "Hit this button with any of your
fingers.")
Under Jorge's proposal before the BF, lo = selkaicfa, le = kaicfa. With
selkaicfa, the speaker has given an explicit description of the required
qualities, and the sumti refers to anything that matches. In kaicfa, the
speaker has given only a partial list of the qualities, in order to aid
the listener in understanding.
So lo poi isn't le.
--
Motorists honked in celebration in this Ramadi as news spread of the assassination of the president of the Iraqi Governing Council Ezzidin Salim Monday. "The GC is nothing," one man shouted. "They are not the Governing Council. They are the Prostitution Council."