BPFK Section: gadri
On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 02:15:19PM -0700, Jorge Llamb?as wrote:
> arj:
> > 1. The new {lo} will have essentially two different meanings with
> > and without quantifiers.
> >
> > Icky and intellectual unfulfilling, but not really a problem.
> > {ku} and {bo} already have different meanings in different
> > contexts.
>
> I don't think the meaning of {lo} changes when you quantify over
> instances. {PA lo broda} is essentially {PA mupli be lo broda}, or {PA
> da poi mupli lo broda}
If this is a strict equivalence, I'd like to see it in the proposal
somewhere.
-Robin