BPFK Section: gadri
> On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 02:15:19PM -0700, Jorge Llamb?as wrote:
> > I don't think the meaning of {lo} changes when you quantify over
> > instances. {PA lo broda} is essentially {PA mupli be lo broda}, or {PA
> > da poi mupli lo broda}
> If this is a strict equivalence, I'd like to see it in the proposal
> somewhere.
It only works with {mupli} meaning "x1 is an instance of x2".
Unfortunately, that's not quite how the gi'uste defines {mupli}.
According to the gi'uste, mupli means "x1 ckaji x2 gi'e cmima x3".
mu'o mi'e xorxes
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger.
http://messenger.yahoo.com/