BPFK Section: gadri
On Fri, Jun 04, 2004 at 12:52:31PM -0700, Jorge Llamb?as wrote:
>
> --- Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 02:15:19PM -0700, Jorge Llamb?as wrote:
> > > I don't think the meaning of {lo} changes when you quantify over
> > > instances. {PA lo broda} is essentially {PA mupli be lo broda}, or
> > > {PA da poi mupli lo broda}
> >
> > If this is a strict equivalence, I'd like to see it in the proposal
> > somewhere.
>
> It only works with {mupli} meaning "x1 is an instance of x2".
> Unfortunately, that's not quite how the gi'uste defines {mupli}.
What about 'me' then?
-Robin