WikiDiscuss Help

Forums > WikiDiscuss > BPFK Section: Non-logical Connectives

BPFK Section: Non-logical Connectives


posts: 324
Use this thread to discuss the BPFK Section: Non-logical Connectives page.


An example of {ku'a}:
la treid. ku'a la traian. midju la carlyt.

phma
--
li ze te'a ci vu'u ci bi'e te'a mu du
li ci su'i ze te'a mu bi'e vu'u ci

 



rlpowell posts: 14214

On Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 09:45:37PM -0500, Pierre Abbat wrote:
> An example of {ku'a}:
> la treid. ku'a la traian. midju la carlyt.

Huh?

-Robin

 



posts: 1912

 


 
> An example of {ku'a}:
> la treid. ku'a la traian. midju la carlyt.

i la carlyt cu tcadu i je xu la treid e la traian cu klaji

mu'o mi'e xorxes

 



__
Do you Yahoo!?
All your favorites on one personal page – Try My Yahoo!
http://my.yahoo.com

 



posts: 2388

If so, this is the wrong kind of itersection;
streets ain't sets (well, I suppose you could
....).


wrote:

>
> --- Pierre Abbat wrote:
>
> > An example of {ku'a}:
> > la treid. ku'a la traian. midju la carlyt.
>
> i la carlyt cu tcadu i je xu la treid e la
> traian cu klaji
>
> mu'o mi'e xorxes
>
>
>
>
>
> __
> Do you Yahoo!?
> All your favorites on one personal page – Try
> My Yahoo!
> http://my.yahoo.com
>
>
>

 



rlpowell posts: 14214

Indeed.

-Robin

On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 06:44:06AM -0800, John E Clifford wrote:
> If so, this is the wrong kind of itersection;
> streets ain't sets (well, I suppose you could
> ...).
>
> --- Jorge Llamb?as
> wrote:
>
> >
> > --- Pierre Abbat wrote:
> >
> > > An example of {ku'a}:
> > > la treid. ku'a la traian. midju la carlyt.
> >
> > i la carlyt cu tcadu i je xu la treid e la
> > traian cu klaji
> >
> > mu'o mi'e xorxes

 



On Monday 29 November 2004 09:44, John E Clifford wrote:
> If so, this is the wrong kind of itersection;
> streets ain't sets (well, I suppose you could
> ...).

The intersection of streets is much more common in daily parlance than the
intersection of sets, so I think it should have a short word. A street can be
regarded as the set of points along it, so the intersection of two streets is
the set of points they have in common, which is what's normally meant,
barring the complication of trying to figure out whether a point in the
fillet is in the street. (I doubt that Trade and Tryon are filleted;
filleting rights-of-way wasn't done on old maps.)

OT: I was in Raleigh with my mother in a clothing store. I asked some
saleslady, "Pardon me for being from Charlotte, but where's the Tryon room?"

phma
--
li ze te'a ci vu'u ci bi'e te'a mu du
li ci su'i ze te'a mu bi'e vu'u ci

 



rlpowell posts: 14214

On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 09:35:19PM -0500, Pierre Abbat wrote:
> On Monday 29 November 2004 09:44, John E Clifford wrote:
> > If so, this is the wrong kind of itersection; streets ain't sets
> > (well, I suppose you could ...).
>
> The intersection of streets is much more common in daily parlance
> than the intersection of sets, so I think it should have a short
> word.

It does, "kruca".

-Robin

 



posts: 2388

Well, the intersection is strictly {le te kruca}
and that seems to be about the right length. On
the other hand, it does seem strange to use cmavo
space for all this set notation (Cartesian
products are even rarer). I suppose the idea is
that mathematics — when someone gets around to
doing it in Lojban — will expect words to match
the notation. I am not sure why, since all
anatural languages seem to manage with it (this
goes for all of MEX as well).


wrote:

> On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 09:35:19PM -0500,
> Pierre Abbat wrote:
> > On Monday 29 November 2004 09:44, John E
> Clifford wrote:
> > > If so, this is the wrong kind of
> itersection; streets ain't sets
> > > (well, I suppose you could ...).
> >
> > The intersection of streets is much more
> common in daily parlance
> > than the intersection of sets, so I think it
> should have a short
> > word.
>
> It does, "kruca".
>
> -Robin
>
>
>

 


Show posts: