WikiDiscuss Help

Forums > WikiDiscuss > BPFK gismu Proposal: jarco

BPFK gismu Proposal: jarco


posts: 1912
Use this thread to discuss the BPFK gismu Proposal: jarco page.


posts: 1912

 
Why not a non-fancy place structure for {jarco}:
"x1 shows x2 to x3", so we can say things like:

mi le cukta cu lebna la djan gi'e jarco la susan gi'e dunda la alis
"I took the book from John, showed it to Susan, and gave it to Alice."

mu'o mi'e xorxes

 



On Thursday 10 February 2005 17:52, wikidiscuss@lojban.org wrote:
> Re: BPFK gismu Proposal: jarco
>
> Why not a non-fancy place structure for {jarco}:
> "x1 shows x2 to x3", so we can say things like:
>
> mi le cukta cu lebna la djan gi'e jarco la susan gi'e dunda la alis
> "I took the book from John, showed it to Susan, and gave it to Alice."

I agree. The more specific defs "x1 shows property x2 to x3" and "x1 shows his
x2ness to x3" can be implemented with lujvo.

phma
--
lo nu punji lo sovda be lo cipnrkuku kukuku
zvati lo zdani be lo na'e cipnrkuku kuku



On Thursday 10 February 2005 17:52, wikidiscuss@lojban.org wrote:
> Re: BPFK gismu Proposal: jarco
>
> Why not a non-fancy place structure for {jarco}:
> "x1 shows x2 to x3", so we can say things like:
>
> mi le cukta cu lebna la djan gi'e jarco la susan gi'e dunda la alis
> "I took the book from John, showed it to Susan, and gave it to Alice."

I agree. The more specific defs "x1 shows property x2 to x3" and "x1 shows his
x2ness to x3" can be implemented with lujvo.

phma
--
lo nu punji lo sovda be lo cipnrkuku kukuku
zvati lo zdani be lo na'e cipnrkuku kuku

 



rlpowell posts: 14214

On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 08:15:32PM -0500, Pierre Abbat wrote:
> On Thursday 10 February 2005 17:52, wikidiscuss@lojban.org wrote:
> > Re: BPFK gismu Proposal: jarco
> >
> > Why not a non-fancy place structure for {jarco}: "x1 shows x2 to
> > x3", so we can say things like:
> >
> > mi le cukta cu lebna la djan gi'e jarco la susan gi'e dunda la
> > alis "I took the book from John, showed it to Susan, and gave
> > it to Alice."
>
> I agree. The more specific defs "x1 shows property x2 to x3" and
> "x1 shows his x2ness to x3" can be implemented with lujvo.

+1

 
-Robin

--
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/
Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!"
Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://singinst.org/

 



posts: 1912

 


> > mi le cukta cu lebna la djan gi'e jarco la susan gi'e dunda la alis
> > "I took the book from John, showed it to Susan, and gave it to Alice."
>
> I agree. The more specific defs "x1 shows property x2 to x3" and "x1 shows
> his x2ness to x3" can be implemented with lujvo.

The definition of {dunda} includes the comment: "x2 may be a specific
object, a commodity (mass), an event, or a property" and {lebna}
has "x2 (object/property)", so for {jarco} a property in x2 would
not be especially odd, as long as it is not restricted to properties
only.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

 


__
Do you Yahoo!?
Meet the all-new My Yahoo! - Try it today!
http://my.yahoo.com

 




On Friday 11 February 2005 23:24, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 08:15:32PM -0500, Pierre Abbat wrote:
> > I agree. The more specific defs "x1 shows property x2 to x3" and
> > "x1 shows his x2ness to x3" can be implemented with lujvo.
>
> +1

ki'a?
--
li ze te'a ci vu'u ci bi'e te'a mu du
li ci su'i ze te'a mu bi'e vu'u ci

 



posts: 1912

 


> On Friday 11 February 2005 23:24, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 08:15:32PM -0500, Pierre Abbat wrote:
> > > I agree. The more specific defs "x1 shows property x2 to x3" and
> > > "x1 shows his x2ness to x3" can be implemented with lujvo.
> >
> > +1
>
> ki'a?

That's a Cowanism (at least I know it as a Cowanism) for "I agree"
or "add my one vote for that".

mu'o mi'e xorxes

 



__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - 250MB free storage. Do more. Manage less.
http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250

 



rlpowell posts: 14214

On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 11:07:42AM -0500, Pierre Abbat wrote:
> On Friday 11 February 2005 23:24, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 08:15:32PM -0500, Pierre Abbat wrote:
> > > I agree. The more specific defs "x1 shows property x2 to x3"
> > > and "x1 shows his x2ness to x3" can be implemented with lujvo.
> >
> > +1
>
> ki'a?

+1 == "I agree, but don't want to waste people's e-mail space by

typing the whole thing out".

-Robin

--
http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/
Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!"
Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://singinst.org/

 



On Sat, 2005-02-12 at 11:31 -0800, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
>On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 11:07:42AM -0500, Pierre Abbat wrote:
>> On Friday 11 February 2005 23:24, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
>> > On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 08:15:32PM -0500, Pierre Abbat wrote:
>> > > I agree. The more specific defs "x1 shows property x2 to x3"
>> > > and "x1 shows his x2ness to x3" can be implemented with lujvo.
>> >
>> > +1
>>
>> ki'a?
>
>+1 == "I agree, but don't want to waste people's e-mail space by
>typing the whole thing out".

..ie is too long?

mu'omi'elabancus

 



rlpowell posts: 14214

On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 12:08:00PM -0800, Theodore Reed wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-02-12 at 11:31 -0800, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> >On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 11:07:42AM -0500, Pierre Abbat wrote:
> >> On Friday 11 February 2005 23:24, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> >> > On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 08:15:32PM -0500, Pierre Abbat wrote:
> >> > > I agree. The more specific defs "x1 shows property x2 to
> >> > > x3" and "x1 shows his x2ness to x3" can be implemented with
> >> > > lujvo.
> >> >
> >> > +1
> >>
> >> ki'a?
> >
> >+1 == "I agree, but don't want to waste people's e-mail space by
> >typing the whole thing out".
>
> .ie is too long?

Forgot.

-Robin

 


Show posts: