Forum: WikiDiscuss

Wiki page BPFK Section: Subordinators changed


posts: 1912

 


> > > > ci prenu noi melbi cu klama
>
> What about:
>
> ci prenu noi melbi cu klama
> = ci prenu goi ko'a cu klama ije ro ko'acu melbi
>
> ?

Yes, that seems to work. You probably don't even need
the {ro}, so as to include non-distributive noi-clauses.

The quantifier {no} would be a special case: {no broda noi
brode cu brodi} seems to be either nonsensical or the noi-clause
is irrelevant, because there is nothing to apply it to.
Within any negation scope, in fact, modifying a quantified
term with a noi-clause gives nonsense.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

 


__
Do you Yahoo!?
Read only the mail you want - Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail

 



The original document is available at http://tiki.lojban.org/tiki/tiki-view_forum_thread.php?topics_offset=1&forumId=1&comments_parentId=2241