WikiDiscuss

Posted by clsn on Mon 15 of Nov, 2004 01:52 GMT posts: 84

Jorge "Llambías" wrote:

>--- Robin Lee Powell wrote:
>
>
>
>>OK, cool. I'm going with "Multiple BAhE cmavo may be used in
>>succession, in which case they all affect the next non-BAhE word.",
>>then.
>>
>>
>
>What if you want to mark a new BAhE as nonce?
>
>(Actually, there was at some point talk about an experimental BAhE
>that meant "what follows continues the utterance of the previous
>speaker, even though I'm a new speaker".)
>
>
Why should that be a BAhE and not a UI?

~mark