Robin's gadri Proposal
> On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 02:04:47PM -0700, Jorge Llamb?as wrote:
> > --- Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> > > How does "mi ja'a pu klama su'o zo'e" not imply "mi ja'a pu klama
> > > zo'e", exactly?
> >
> > The second sentence leaves more to context. By making {su'o} explicit,
> > you prevent a more precise claim from being derived from context.
>
> I'm not disagreeing, I'm just not sure I understand. Can you give a
> value for the second sentence that can't be encompassed by the first?
The obvious value from the example I gave is {le zarci}.
{mi ja'a klama le zarci} is not the same answer as
{mi ja'a klama su'o le zarci} to the question
{xu do klama le zarci}.
mu'o mi'e xorxes
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail is new and improved - Check it out!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail