WikiDiscuss Help

Forums > WikiDiscuss > BPFK Section: Nonce Connectives > Re: BPFK Section: Nonce Connectives

Re: BPFK Section: Nonce Connectives


rlpowell posts: 14214

The Red Book, C16 S19 says:

Multiple BAhE cmavo may be used in succession.

Umm, *OK*. What does it *mean*, though?

Does {mi ba'e za'e ba'e ba'e broda} imply that the second ba'e is a nonce word, or does the whole thing imply that broda is nonce, for example?

I suppose it doesn't matter much; we don't need a hard and fast rule, but some indication ("in which case they all affect the next non-BAhE word", for example) would be nice.

-Robin


Show posts: