WikiDiscuss Help

Forums > WikiDiscuss > BPFK Section: Nonce Connectives > BPFK Section: Nonce Connectives

BPFK Section: Nonce Connectives


posts: 1912

 


> +1 on all points. Frankly, I don't think we need a formal way to say
> "This utterance continues the last person's utterance".

I am not advocating for such a cmavo either. I think {i si} or
something like it can serve as an informal way.

The point that started this was that it is possible to have
an experimental member of BAhE marked as nonce, so the
parse BAhE (BAhE? (whatever)) (which is what Robin has now,
I think) does make sense.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

 


__
Do you Yahoo!?
Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page.
www.yahoo.com

 



Show posts: