WikiDiscuss

Robin Lee Powell:
> If Rob is correct about the total lack of other implication, and/or that
> the new lo is completely generic (which I think is the same thing), it
> would be a good idea to explicitely point this out.

How about:
"Generic article. The resulting expression refers generically
to any individual or group that satisfies the predicate."

> BTW, I don't think you've talked about tu'o on the page yet.

I have, in one of the notes. I didn't want to include {tu'o}
in the definition of {lo} because it is rather marginal. I doubt
it will be used much if at all. Substances don't really
need special marking in most cases. Since this is really
about {tu'o} more than about {lo}, it should be treated in
the definition of {tu'o}.

mu'o mi'e xorxes

__
Do you Yahoo!?
Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger.
http://messenger.yahoo.com/