BPFK Section: gadri
On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 12:01:47PM -0700, Jorge Llamb?as wrote:
>
> Robin Lee Powell:
> > If Rob is correct about the total lack of other implication, and/or
> > that the new lo is completely generic (which I think is the same
> > thing), it would be a good idea to explicitely point this out.
>
> How about:
> "Generic article. The resulting expression refers generically to any
> individual or group that satisfies the predicate."
Err. Nevermind.
> > BTW, I don't think you've talked about tu'o on the page yet.
>
> I have, in one of the notes.
Err, nevermind again.
-Robin