BPFK Checkpoints Posted by arj on Thu 23 of Oct, 2003 15:11 GMT posts: 953 Use this thread to discuss the BPFK Checkpoints page.
Posted by xorxes on Thu 23 of Oct, 2003 15:51 GMT posts: 1912 I think there should be a category for tags: selmahos BAI, CAhA, CUhE, KI, ZI, PU, VA, FAhA, ZEhA, VEhA, VIhA, TAhE, ZAhO, ROI, MOhI, FEhE, FIhO, FEhU. Many issues are better treated for them in general rather than dealing with each selmaho separately.
Posted by rlpowell on Thu 23 of Oct, 2003 18:02 GMT posts: 14214 On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 08:51:18AM -0700, wikidiscuss@lojban.org wrote: > > Re:BPFK Checkpoints > > I think there should be a category for tags: selmahos BAI, CAhA, > CUhE, KI, ZI, PU, VA, FAhA, ZEhA, VEhA, VIhA, TAhE, ZAhO, ROI, > MOhI, FEhE, FIhO, FEhU. Many issues are better treated for them in > general rather than dealing with each selmaho separately. Ummm, ROI and MOI are sumtcita clases? Example, please. -Robin -- Me: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. "Constant neocortex override is the only thing that stops us all from running out and eating all the cookies." — Eliezer Yudkowsky http://www.lojban.org/ *** .i cimo'o prali .ui
Posted by rlpowell on Thu 23 of Oct, 2003 18:02 GMT posts: 14214 On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 08:51:18AM -0700, wikidiscuss@lojban.org wrote: > I think there should be a category for tags: selmahos BAI, CAhA, > CUhE, KI, ZI, PU, VA, FAhA, ZEhA, VEhA, VIhA, TAhE, ZAhO, ROI, > MOhI, FEhE, FIhO, FEhU. Many issues are better treated for them in > general rather than dealing with each selmaho separately. Let me know what you think of what I've got now. -Robin -- Me: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. "Constant neocortex override is the only thing that stops us all from running out and eating all the cookies." — Eliezer Yudkowsky http://www.lojban.org/ *** .i cimo'o prali .ui
Posted by xorxes on Thu 23 of Oct, 2003 18:02 GMT posts: 1912 > > I think there should be a category for tags: selmahos BAI, CAhA, > > CUhE, KI, ZI, PU, VA, FAhA, ZEhA, VEhA, VIhA, TAhE, ZAhO, ROI, > > MOhI, FEhE, FIhO, FEhU. Many issues are better treated for them in > > general rather than dealing with each selmaho separately. > > Ummm, ROI and MOI are sumtcita clases? Example, please. mi klama le zarci reroi le purlamdei I went to the market twice yesterday. I didn't include MOI. If you mean MOhI, it is a tag modifier. It can only appear modifying FAhA, which is a tag. mu'o mi'e xorxes __ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search http://shopping.yahoo.com
Posted by rlpowell on Thu 23 of Oct, 2003 18:04 GMT posts: 14214 On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 10:51:19AM -0700, Jorge Llamb?as wrote: snip ROI > I didn't include MOI. If you mean MOhI, it is a tag modifier. It > can only appear modifying FAhA, which is a tag. OK, how is it now? -Robin -- Me: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. "Constant neocortex override is the only thing that stops us all from running out and eating all the cookies." — Eliezer Yudkowsky http://www.lojban.org/ *** .i cimo'o prali .ui
Posted by rlpowell on Thu 23 of Oct, 2003 18:06 GMT posts: 14214 On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 11:03:50AM -0700, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 10:51:19AM -0700, Jorge Llamb?as wrote: > snip ROI > > I didn't include MOI. If you mean MOhI, it is a tag modifier. It > > can only appear modifying FAhA, which is a tag. > > OK, how is it now? Why the hell are we discussing this in the Checkpoints thread instead of the Sections thread? -Robin -- Me: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. "Constant neocortex override is the only thing that stops us all from running out and eating all the cookies." — Eliezer Yudkowsky http://www.lojban.org/ *** .i cimo'o prali .ui
Posted by xorxes on Thu 23 of Oct, 2003 18:28 GMT posts: 1912 > Why the hell are we discussing this in the Checkpoints thread > instead of the Sections thread? > > -Robin I first thought Checkpoints was where you were grouping things. mi'e xorxes __ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search http://shopping.yahoo.com
Posted by xorxes on Thu 23 of Oct, 2003 21:06 GMT posts: 1912 > On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 10:51:19AM -0700, Jorge Llamb?as wrote: > snip ROI > > I didn't include MOI. If you mean MOhI, it is a tag modifier. It > > can only appear modifying FAhA, which is a tag. > > OK, how is it now? Seems good. How do we proceed? I wrote this about tags in general: http://www.lojban.org/tiki/tiki-index.php?page=tags+as+connectives mu'o mi'e xorxes __ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search http://shopping.yahoo.com
Posted by rlpowell on Thu 23 of Oct, 2003 21:06 GMT posts: 14214 On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 11:13:00AM -0700, Jorge Llamb?as wrote: > > --- Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 10:51:19AM -0700, Jorge Llamb?as wrote: > > snip ROI > > > I didn't include MOI. If you mean MOhI, it is a tag modifier. It > > > can only appear modifying FAhA, which is a tag. > > > > OK, how is it now? > > Seems good. How do we proceed? Create and lock pages for all your sections, please. Then wait for me to announce things. -Robin -- Me: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. "Constant neocortex override is the only thing that stops us all from running out and eating all the cookies." — Eliezer Yudkowsky http://www.lojban.org/ *** .i cimo'o prali .ui
Posted by arj on Wed 11 of Apr, 2007 21:06 GMT posts: 953 It was suggested by Jorge in the thread about irrealis attitudinals that we should postpone the issue for now, and move on to other sections until we've gained some momentum. To gain momentum, it is important that everyone is working together, because toiling away in one's own little corner has a tendency of quickly becoming boring. So, IMO the right medicine now is to get to work on another checkpoint. I suggest we do Pro-sumti first. It's not all easy (like BAI), nor staggeringly complicated (like MEX), so we shouldn't start to get bored, or caught up in a web of conflicting issues that one needs to have a PhD to disentangle. What do you say? -- Arnt Richard Johansen
