WikiDiscuss

It would probably be a good idea to mark which of these are not backwards compatible. In particular, merging CMENE into GOhA is unacceptably (to me) incompatable, because it completely changes the parse of bridi like {la .xorxes. cusku} (which becomes a sumti, (a {.xorxes. cusku} tanru), instead of a full bridi).

On 5/31/07, Eimi <wikidiscuss@lojban.org> wrote:
>
> It would probably be a good idea to mark which of these are not
> backwards compatible.

Yes, good idea, I'll look into it.

None of them are outrageously incompatible, but some are in some
details. (Of course, the ones that consist of "eliminate" are obviously
backwards incompatible in theory, if not in practice if they have never
been used.)

> In particular, merging CMENE into GOhA is unacceptably (to me)
> incompatable, because it completely changes the parse of bridi like
> {la .xorxes. cusku} (which becomes a sumti, (a {.xorxes. cusku}
> tanru), instead of a full bridi).

Yes, but the benefits in my opinion far outweigh that cost. (This has
been discussed somewhere and I might add some discussion of
the pro's and con's at some point.)

mu'o mi'e xorxes