Lojban In General

Lojban In General

Forum List Topic List

Forums > Lojban In General > tagged termsets
 
Thread actions
Print this page
  • Print all pages

    • tagged termsets

    Posted by lagejyspa on Thu 17 of Dec, 2009 15:44 GMT posts: 350

    Totus asked about the following at the end of Esther chapter 3

    ciska tetai piro se mi'esku be la xaMAN. bei ge le turni pe le
    nolraitru ge'u .e le viptru vu'o poi turni ro selje'a ku'o gi le nobli
    be ro natmi be'o nu'i ge tecu'u ro selje'a sepi'o lo selyle'u pe ri gi
    tecu'u ro natmi bau lo bangu be ri

    "Shouldn't there be a {nu'u} in front of {gi}? (CLL Chapter 14, example 11..7)"

    I wasn't really sure. He may very well be right. Both parse, but I'm
    not sure exactly the difference is semantically (and jbofi'e doesn't
    handle tagged termsets), so I was wondering if some kind jbocre can
    help us out here?


    So, anyone willing to answer? It came up again,
    --gejyspa


    To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
    with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
    you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.

    Reads: 12687
    Link
    Posted by Minimiscience on Thu 17 of Dec, 2009 16:06 GMT posts: 3588

    de'i li 17 pi'e 12 pi'e 2009 la'o fy. Michael Turniansky .fy. cusku zoi
    skamyxatra.
    > Totus asked about the following at the end of Esther chapter 3
    ...
    > So, anyone willing to answer? It came up again
    .skamyxatra

    This was already answered when you asked about this on the WikiDiscuss mailing
    list two months ago. Since I'm not sure how to link to that list's archives,
    here are the responses that were given:

    Jorge:
    > "Tagged termsets" or "tagged-term sets"? The former are not grammatical.
    >
    > Anyway, "nu'u" makes no difference, it's an elidable terminator, and
    > there are two of them, one for each termset:
    >
    > nu'i ge tecu'u ro selje'a sepi'o lo selyle'u pe ri nu'u gi tecu'u
    > ro natmi bau lo bangu be ri nu'u

    You replied:
    > But why then does the CLL not mark the first nu'u as elidible in the
    > example cited by Andrew? I assumed that the scoping was somehow
    > different between the two versions.

    Jorge replied:
    > I assume it's just a typo. In fact the first "nu'u" is more elidable
    > than the second, because "gi" itself always shows the end of the first
    > termset.

    Do you still have any questions?

    mu'omi'e .kamymecraijun.

    --
    ko na xalni


    To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
    with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
    you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.

    Link
    Posted by lagejyspa on Thu 17 of Dec, 2009 16:13 GMT posts: 350

    On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 11:03 AM, Minimiscience <minimiscience@gmail.com> wrote:
    > de'i li 17 pi'e 12 pi'e 2009 la'o fy. Michael Turniansky .fy. cusku zoi
    > skamyxatra.
    >> Totus asked about the following at the end of Esther chapter 3
    > ...
    >> So, anyone willing to answer?  It came up again
    > .skamyxatra
    >
    > This was already answered when you asked about this on the WikiDiscuss mailing
    > list two months ago.  Since I'm not sure how to link to that list's archives,
    > here are the responses that were given:
    >
    > Jorge:
    >> "Tagged termsets" or "tagged-term sets"? The former are not grammatical.
    >>
    >> Anyway, "nu'u" makes no difference, it's an elidable terminator, and
    >> there are two of them, one for each termset:
    >>
    >> nu'i ge tecu'u ro selje'a sepi'o lo selyle'u pe ri nu'u gi tecu'u
    >> ro natmi bau lo bangu be ri nu'u
    >
    > You replied:
    >> But why then does the CLL not mark the first nu'u as elidible in the
    >> example cited by Andrew?  I assumed that the scoping was somehow
    >> different between the two versions.
    >
    > Jorge replied:
    >> I assume it's just a typo. In fact the first "nu'u" is more elidable
    >> than the second, because "gi" itself always shows the end of the first
    >> termset.
    >
    > Do you still have any questions?
    >
    > mu'omi'e .kamymecraijun.
    >
    > --
    > ko na xalni
    >

    Weird, I THOUGHT it had been answered, but I cou;dn't find the
    answer.. thanks -gy


    To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
    with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
    you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.

    Link