Stuff that should go here:
Some points to mention:
See http://jbovlaste.lojban.org/wiki/Some%20general%20info%20on%20Lojban%20for%20the%20mini-dictionary
See http://jbovlaste.lojban.org/wiki/how%20to%20use%20this%20book
Also, a starting point might be
http://www.lojban.org/files/draft-dictionary/Working/dictbook.ZIP .
IPA is must.
This section is for general issues surrounding an entire grammatical
category, or whatever. Stuff that would otherwise get repeated
many, many times in the various definitions.
This section needs a better name.
This is a very rough draft, largely stolen from bancus.
Every BAI expression is equivalent to a FIhO + selbri + FEhU
expression. Both forms are valid in all places the each form is
valid.
This contradicts the CLLv1, but the CLLv1 clearly states the old
behaviour was due to parser limitations.
It has been determined that BAI is effectively fi'o BAPLI, and that the following
derivation exists:
* SE BAI == fi'o SE BAPLI
* BAInai == fi'o na BAPLI
* na'eBAI == fi'o na'e BAPLI
* to'eBAI == fi'o to'e BAPLI
This is shown as the following:
* ri'a == with cause
* ri'anai == not with cause
* to'eri'a == prevented by
* to'eri'anai == not prevented by (despite)
Putting KU immediately after a BAI tag is equivalent to "BAI zo'e"
in all respects. It is generally translated into English as an
adverb. For example, "mi klama bai ku" is "I compelledly go".
Putting a BAI tag immediately before the selbri is exactly the same
as putting BAI + KU immediately before the selbri.
BAI can interact with connectives in various ways, which are mostly
beyond the scope of this document (see CLL or other Lojban learning
materials). In particular, BAI before a forethought connective
causes the BAI to have scope over the entire structure, and BAI + BO
after an afterthought connective causes the BAI to have scope over
the structure to the right (after the BAI + BO).
This is worth mentioning here because constructs like ".i ri'a bo"
meaning "because" (specifically a physical cause) are incredibly
common in Lojban.
Unless the individual word entries specify otherwise, interjections
are words that are used to express the emotional state of the
speaker directly, propositional attitude indicators are words that
are used to express the emotional state of the speaker with respect
to a state of the universe that may or may not (probably not) be the
case, evidentials are words that are used to express how the speaker
came to know something, and discursives are metalinguistic claims by
the speaker about something said.
The effect of these words is associated with the referent of the
immediately preceding word, or construct started or terminated by
that word, even if the construct is otherwise empty (in which case
the exact thing the emotion is directed towards is unspecified).
At the end of the dictionary:
Sorted on rafsi. It's probably best to have these in an appendix, instead of
mixed with the bulk of the dictionary. In order to be helpful in decomposing
unknown lujvo, it would have to have all of the following entries (for example):