Lojban
The Logical Language
Log in
Username:
Password:
I forgot my password |
CapsLock is on.
Log in
History: BPFK gismu Proposal: gletu
View page
Source of version: 2
(current)
During a (lengthy) conversation on IRC on October 2nd, 2007, the following issues with gletu were determined: * The restriction to two parties is unnecessary. ** This is an issue common to many other gismu (penmi, jorne, kansa, tunba, simsa, dunli, frica, ...). One way to deal with it is with -si'u. glesi'u: ''x1 (group) have sex together''. * The note about x1 and x2 being symmetrical should be adjusted to something like "active partner unspecified" to allow for words that build from gletu for acts that are asymmetrical in nature. **It only means that if A gletu B, then B gletu A. It doesn't mean that if A brodygletu B, then B brodygletu A, or that if A glebroda B, then B glebroda A. A gismu meaning ''x1 does to x2 action x3'', where x1 is the agent and x2 the patient for any action would be useful though.
About
Introduction
What Others Say
FAQ
Learning
Books
Vocabulary
Lojbanic Software
Community
Web/Email Forums
IRC Chat
Links
News
Dictionary
Swag
Multimedia
Lojbanic Texts
Audio
Wiki
Recent Changes
Popular Pages
How To Edit
The LLG
Official Projects
Publications
Donate!
Contact Us
Search Lojban Resources