History: Lessons Errata

Preview of version: 1

In chapter 2, section "gismu as sumti":
...you don't need cu after mi (I/me/we), do (you, the person(s) I'm talking to) or any words like this ('pro-sumti', in Lojban jargon).

In chapter 3, section "Questions":
...mi cu na nelci la bil. means "It is not true that I like Bill," or in other words, "I don't like Bill."
Tip: By default, na is followed by a selbri. Since cu has the job of indicating that a selbri is coming up, na makes it superfluous. So you can simply say mi na nelci la bil.

The use of cu after mi in the second paste is not explained, and to say that it is not needed because the na is there is to say that it would be needed if na were not there.

History

Advanced
Information Version
Thu 11 of May, 2006 16:57 GMT rlpowell from 64.241.242.18 6
Sun 12 of Jun, 2005 07:40 GMT matius from 68.220.75.35 5
Sat 11 of Jun, 2005 03:44 GMT matius from 68.220.75.35 4
Fri 10 of Jun, 2005 22:34 GMT matius from 68.220.75.35 3
Fri 10 of Jun, 2005 00:29 GMT matius from 68.220.79.254 2
Thu 09 of Jun, 2005 11:55 GMT matius from 68.220.90.231 1
Show PHP error messages