History: Lessons Errata

Source of version: 1

In chapter 2, section "gismu as sumti": ...you don't need cu after mi (I/me/we), do (you, the person(s) I'm talking to) or any words like this ('pro-sumti', in Lojban jargon). In chapter 3, section "Questions": ...mi cu na nelci la bil. means "It is not true that I like Bill," or in other words, "I don't like Bill." Tip: By default, na is followed by a selbri. Since cu has the job of indicating that a selbri is coming up, na makes it superfluous. So you can simply say mi na nelci la bil. The use of cu after mi in the second paste is not explained, and to say that it is not needed because the na is there is to say that it would be needed if na were not there.

History

Enable pagination rows per page

HTML diff Side-by-side diff Side-by-side diff by characters Inline diff Inline diff by characters Full side-by-side diff Full side-by-side diff by characters Full inline diff Full inline diff by characters Unified diff Side-by-side view HTML diff Side-by-side diff Advanced

Information	Version
Thu 11 of May, 2006 16:57 GMT rlpowell from 64.241.242.18	6
Sun 12 of Jun, 2005 07:40 GMT matius from 68.220.75.35	5
Sat 11 of Jun, 2005 03:44 GMT matius from 68.220.75.35	4
Fri 10 of Jun, 2005 22:34 GMT matius from 68.220.75.35	3
Fri 10 of Jun, 2005 00:29 GMT matius from 68.220.79.254	2
Thu 09 of Jun, 2005 11:55 GMT matius from 68.220.90.231	1

Select action to perform with checked... Remove OK