16:41 <vensa> why is {gi} defined as "logical connective: ALL BUT TANRU-INTERNAL forethought connective medial marker.", if it is in fact used also within a forethought TANRU construct?
16:49 == rossi ~rossi@HSI-KBW-109-193-128-041.hsi7.kabel-badenwuerttemberg.de has quit Quit: leaving
16:55 <kribacr> It's not, as far as I know.
16:57 <vensa> It's NOT what?
16:59 <kribacr> I believe *{broda GI brode GA brodi} is a parsefail.
17:00 <vensa> huh? how does that answer the question?
17:00 <vensa> I'm talking about {da GUhA broda gi brode}
17:02 <vensa> gerna da gu'a broda gi brode de
17:02 <gerna> (0da CU {<gu'a broda gi brode> <de VAU>})0
17:02 <vensa> seems ok
17:02 <vensa> so why the ill-worded def?
17:02 <@xalbo> right, GI works with GUhA too. The definition is in error.
17:02 <vensa> I suspect a copy-paste error
17:02 <vensa> .ui
17:02 <vensa> xalbo: can you fix it (officialy)?
17:03 <kribacr> Ah... yeah.
17:03 <kribacr> Didn't click, you're right.
17:03 == kucli 52e89185@gateway/web/freenode/ip.82.232.145.133 has joined #lojban
17:03 <kribacr> I forgot about that.
17:03 <vensa> np
17:03 <kucli> Coi ke'u
17:03 <@xalbo> byfy is working through defining all the cmavo. When we get to {gi}, I'm sure it won't look like that.