History: The Definition of {gi}

Source of version: 3 (current)

{CODE(wrap="1")}[16:41] <vensa> why is {gi} defined as "logical connective: ALL BUT TANRU-INTERNAL forethought connective medial marker.", if it is in fact used also within a forethought TANRU construct? [16:49] == rossi [~rossi@HSI-KBW-109-193-128-041.hsi7.kabel-badenwuerttemberg.de] has quit [Quit: leaving] [16:55] <kribacr> It's not, as far as I know. [16:57] <vensa> It's NOT what? [16:59] <kribacr> I believe *{broda GI brode GA brodi} is a parsefail. [17:00] <vensa> huh? how does that answer the question? [17:00] <vensa> I'm talking about {da GUhA broda gi brode} [17:02] <vensa> gerna da gu'a broda gi brode de [17:02] <gerna> (0[da CU {<gu'a broda gi brode> <de VAU>}])0 [17:02] <vensa> seems ok [17:02] <vensa> so why the ill-worded def? [17:02] <@xalbo> right, GI works with GUhA too. The definition is in error. [17:02] <vensa> I suspect a copy-paste error [17:02] <vensa> .ui [17:02] <vensa> xalbo: can you fix it (officialy)? [17:03] <kribacr> Ah... yeah. [17:03] <kribacr> Didn't click, you're right. [17:03] == kucli [52e89185@gateway/web/freenode/ip.82.232.145.133] has joined #lojban [17:03] <kribacr> I forgot about that. [17:03] <vensa> np [17:03] <kucli> Coi ke'u [17:03] <@xalbo> byfy is working through defining all the cmavo. When we get to {gi}, I'm sure it won't look like that. {CODE}