[phma@phma.hn.org: NOT SURE]
> Do you concur?
We are accepting these, because we accept y after any CVC rafsi,
not only when it is required:
> vaxyselnandu — BAD (should be vaxselnandu)
> retysku — BAD
> mutyminji — BAD
> rixyflo — BAD
> cakyrepsa — BAD (tricky! He meant {cakyrespa} which is valid. But "ps" is
> not
> a valid initial pair, so the 'y' is not needed.)
> lojybadna — BAD
> rapykla — BAD
> sezygletu — BAD
> famygau — BAD
> gusypi'a — BAD
> macypre — BAD
> nandykaio — BAD
> pezydjine — BAD
> titynanba — BAD
These we don't accept, but as I said, the restriction on
admissible vowel pairs could be relaxed if we wanted to,
as long as we use the same rule for cmene, cmavo and fu'ivla:
> daed — NOT SURE (judgment call on comma)
> skamrmouse — NOT SURE (but skamrmo,use is valid)
> nu,york — NOT SURE (but he certainly didn't mean nu,y,ork, which is valid)
> saying — NOT SURE (sa,y,ing is valid)
> meant — NOT SURE (comma)
> pleasant — NOT SURE (comma)
> unpleasant — NOT SURE
This one should be BAD, {gx} is voiced-unvoiced:
> gugxrusko — GOOD
We don't accept digits in fu'ivla currently. That could be changed:
> Elrond42 — huh?? ({elrondvore} is a valid fu'ivla, but I don't know how he
> meant to pronounce {Elrond42})
mu'o mi'e xorxes
__
Do you Yahoo!?
All your favorites on one personal page – Try My Yahoo!
http://my.yahoo.com