Lojban In General

Lojban In General


questions about Ruth

posts: 493

Someone mentioned Ruth on the jbovlaste list so I started reading through
it. So far I'm only up to 1:17 but I've found the following things that
need correcting I think:

1) In verses 1 and 2 there are 3 occurrences of "xabji" where I think the
author wanted "xabju".
2) In verse 8 where the author said {.i la na,oMIN cusku fi le be'aspe lu
...} I think they wanted {.i la na,oMIN cusku fi le be'aspe fe lu ...}
3) In verse 17 we have {.i .aicai noda poi na'e nunmorsi zo'u da tersepli
mi do} I think it's going for "nothing which is not the event of death will
separate mi from you". But really isn't it saying "nothing (other than
death) that thing is separated from me plus some un-defined x4 place for
{do}
. In other words, doesn't {noda poi ... zo'u} take x1 which puts the
next {da} in at x2 (causing {mi} to go to x3 and {do} to go to x4)?

If I find more stuff as I read through I'll just put it in this thread.

posts: 493

Also, 2:2 has the same issue as 2) below.

So, I'm finding Ruth to be a really good read and excellent practice for my
lojban skills. How can I contribute to this project?

On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Luke Bergen <lukeabergen@gmail.com> wrote:

> Someone mentioned Ruth on the jbovlaste list so I started reading through
> it. So far I'm only up to 1:17 but I've found the following things that
> need correcting I think:
>
> 1) In verses 1 and 2 there are 3 occurrences of "xabji" where I think the
> author wanted "xabju".
> 2) In verse 8 where the author said {.i la na,oMIN cusku fi le be'aspe lu
> ...} I think they wanted {.i la na,oMIN cusku fi le be'aspe fe lu ...}
> 3) In verse 17 we have {.i .aicai noda poi na'e nunmorsi zo'u da tersepli
> mi do} I think it's going for "nothing which is not the event of death will
> separate mi from you". But really isn't it saying "nothing (other than
> death) that thing is separated from me plus some un-defined x4 place for
> {do}
. In other words, doesn't {noda poi ... zo'u} take x1 which puts the
> next {da} in at x2 (causing {mi} to go to x3 and {do} to go to x4)?
>
> If I find more stuff as I read through I'll just put it in this thread.
>