'Esperanto' (unofficial)--see: http://people.fix.no/arj/lojban/unofficial-gismu.html
First proposed (with a real chance back then of it becoming official!) by John Cowan: http://balance.wiw.org/~jkominek/lojban/9012/msg00009.html , rejected at Logfest 91: http://balance.wiw.org/~jkominek/lojban/9106/msg00127.html.
spe'anto is better, IMO. --jay
But The Book explicitely suggests CCVVCV for cultural fu'ivla! — kir
This being a strawpoll , I'm diehard behind bangrnesperanto — nitcion Maybe banrsperanto? Being hardcore fundamentalist, I avoid this as not being canonical per the Book. ???!!! How is it not canonical? Fine: "not the default strategy suggested."
Spero all the way! - kreig.daniyl.
Since I think we need to jettison all cultural gismu (except "lojbo") and replace them with stage threes, Esperanto is no exception! --xod
'All the ire aroused by this comment was moved here'
The idea of cultural gismu is totes inconsistent, considering the nature of Lojban. However, the prefixes and suffixes are sometimes useful. - Plastic Raven