History: spero

Source of version: 3 (current)

'((Esperanto))' (unofficial)--see: [http://people.fix.no/arj/lojban/unofficial-gismu.html First] proposed (with a real chance back then of it becoming official!) by ((John Cowan)): [http://balance.wiw.org/~jkominek/lojban/9012/msg00009.html] , rejected at Logfest 91: [http://balance.wiw.org/~jkominek/lojban/9106/msg00127.html]. According] to proposal in chapter 4.16 of ((The Book)), fu'ivla ''spe'ato'' can be used instead. How do you like this? -- ((Cyril Slobin|kir)) ''spe'anto'' is better, IMO. --((Jay Kominek|jay)) ''But The Book explicitely suggests CCVVCV for cultural fu'ivla! -- ((Cyril Slobin|kir))'' This being a strawpoll :-) , I'm diehard behind ''bangrnesperanto'' -- ((nitcion)) ''Maybe banrsperanto?'' Being hardcore fundamentalist, I avoid this as not being canonical per the Book. ''???!!! How is it not canonical?'' Fine: "not the default strategy suggested." Spero all the way! - ((kreig.daniyl.)) Well, I'm in favour of ''((pacnybau))''. --((tsali)) ''Since I think we need to jettison all ((cultural gismu)) (except "lojbo") and replace them with stage threes, Esperanto is no exception! --xod'' '''All the ire aroused by this comment was moved ((The Emergence of Lojban Nationalism|here))''' **pe'i it is okay to keep cultural gismu and add new ones so long as the existing ones lose their rafsi (in usage or in Ideal Lojban). See ((Boo to cultural gismu)). --((And)) The idea of cultural gismu is totes inconsistent, considering the nature of Lojban. However, the prefixes and suffixes are sometimes useful. - ((UserPagePlasticRaven|Plastic Raven))