WikiDiscuss

Posted by namor on Sat 10 of May, 2008 21:35 GMT posts: 42

The script doesn't find words you already learned in the Pauker-Vocabulary-File, so it adds them again as unlearned. :-\
(This is because the Pauker Software adds a timestamp when the Voc. has been learned, so the 'stupid search routine' doesn't recognize the Voc. anymore as the one we've just searched for.)

I made a rather dirty fix on this.:

simply replace (line 163 or so): CODE
if card_search_term in lojbancards:
print "\nThat card is already in your flashcard deck."
return

/CODEwith:CODE

card_search_term = """%s

%s

""" % (front, back)

if card_search_term in lojbancards:
print "\nThat card is already in your flashcard deck."
return

/CODE

As you can see, this simply doesn't search for the first line of the xml-entry, which contains the timestamp. Quick and dirty, but it works.

Best regards,
namor

> Use this thread to discuss the page:: Lojval

Posted by namor on Sat 10 of May, 2008 21:53 GMT posts: 42

Apparently the listserver ate most of the inline fix,
so I uploaded the fixed lojval.py file to the wiki.

Best regards,
Namor

> Use this thread to discuss the page:: Lojval

Posted by namor on Sun 11 of May, 2008 07:25 GMT posts: 42

Apparently the listserver ate most of the inline fix,
so I uploaded the fixed lojval.py file to the wiki.

Best regards,
Namor

Am Samstag 10 Mai 2008 23:35:27 schrieb namor:
> Aw: Lojval error with Pauker FIX included
>
> Author: namor
>
> The script doesn't find words you already learned in the
> Pauker-Vocabulary-File, so it adds them again as unlearned. :-\ (This is
> because the Pauker Software adds a timestamp when the Voc. has been
> learned, so the 'stupid search routine' doesn't recognize the Voc. anymore
> as the one we've just searched for.)
>
> I made a rather dirty fix on this.:
>
> simply replace (line 163 or so): CODE
> if card_search_term in lojbancards:
> print "\nThat card is already in your flashcard deck."
> return
>
> /CODEwith:CODE
>
> card_search_term = """%s
>
>
>
> %s
>
>
> """ % (front, back)
>
> if card_search_term in lojbancards:
> print "\nThat card is already in your flashcard deck."
> return
>
> /CODE
>
> As you can see, this simply doesn't search for the first line of the
> xml-entry, which contains the timestamp. Quick and dirty, but it works.
>
> Best regards,
> namor
>
> > Use this thread to discuss the page:: Lojval