Attribution (was: BPFK Section: lerfu Shifts) Posted by clsn on Fri 30 of Jan, 2004 21:54 GMT posts: 84 Use this thread to discuss the Attribution (was: BPFK Section: lerfu Shifts) page.
Posted by clsn on Fri 30 of Jan, 2004 21:54 GMT posts: 84 Is it just me, or does everyone get this message (as well as others, but not all, from this list) sans attribution? Just "wikidiscuss@lojban.org." What's up with that? Leaves one puzzled about the antecedent of "I". ~mark wikidiscuss@lojban.org wrote: >Re: BPFK Section: lerfu Shifts > >to'a being in that list was a mistake. Thanks. > >It's my opinion that 'zai' was assigned to the wrong section, but I'll just leave it alone. > > >
Posted by rlpowell on Fri 30 of Jan, 2004 21:54 GMT posts: 14214 On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 03:58:45PM -0500, Mark E. Shoulson wrote: > Is it just me, or does everyone get this message (as well as > others, but not all, from this list) sans attribution? Just > "wikidiscuss@lojban.org." What's up with that? Leaves one > puzzled about the antecedent of "I". As you can see, I do not. I'm pretty sure that's the fault of someone's e-mail client. -Robin
