WikiDiscuss

WikiDiscuss


This comment is s bit misleading, as it suggests that there is something
special about MAI that breaks LALR(1). But even if MAI were to be removed
from the language, or made prefix, the problem with numbers would remain
just the same, because you can't tell "number MOI", "number ROI" and
"number /BOI/" appart from each other without indefinite lookahead,
the same goes for "lerfu-string MOI" vs. "lerfu-string /BOI/", and I think
compound tags break LALR(1) too.


"A term is either a sumti or a sumti preceded by a tense or modal tag."

Also: "na ku", "tag ku" and the most weird "fa ku" are terms.

mu'o mi'e xorxes


posts: 324

On Tuesday 05 June 2007 15:04, Jorge Llambías wrote:
> Also: "na ku", "tag ku" and the most weird "fa ku" are terms.

A term can come after {pe}, yielding some weird sentences: {le gerku pe fa ku
pu viska le mlatu pe na ku}. Should we attempt to assign a meaning to those,
or should we explicitly define them as meaningless?

Pierre


posts: 149

Pierre Abbat scripsit:
> On Tuesday 05 June 2007 15:04, Jorge Llambías wrote:
> > Also: "na ku", "tag ku" and the most weird "fa ku" are terms.
>
> A term can come after {pe}, yielding some weird sentences: {le gerku pe fa ku
> pu viska le mlatu pe na ku}. Should we attempt to assign a meaning to those,
> or should we explicitly define them as meaningless?

I interpret "pe fa ku" to mean "pe the x1 of this bridi", but I can't
interpret "pe naku", I admit.

--
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
You tollerday donsk? N. You tolkatiff scowegian? Nn.
You spigotty anglease? Nnn. You phonio saxo? Nnnn.
Clear all so! `Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)


On 6/6/07, John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org> wrote:
> Pierre Abbat scripsit:
> >
> > A term can come after {pe}, yielding some weird sentences: {le gerku pe fa ku
> > pu viska le mlatu pe na ku}. Should we attempt to assign a meaning to those,
> > or should we explicitly define them as meaningless?
>
> I interpret "pe fa ku" to mean "pe the x1 of this bridi", but I can't
> interpret "pe naku", I admit.

How about this:

le re mlatu cu fa'u gi xekri gi nai xekri
.i le gerku pu viska le mlatu pe na ku

mu'o mi'e xorxes